Improve Pesticides Over Standard and Strengthen Supervision of Pesticide Residues

In recent years, due to the emergence of a series of problems such as "problem watermelon", "problem strawberry" and "poisonous leek", pesticide residues have aroused widespread concern. How can pesticide residues cause people to think deeply?

Every time there is an outbreak of pesticide residues, we will always hear such statements as "source control, strengthening supervision, and strict accountability." In fact, they say so many times, and the results are still inadequate. In fact, it is difficult for enterprises to seek profits and avoid disadvantages because they are consciously corrected by the company. The key to the problem is to look at the responsibility of the supervisory department and work efficiency.

First of all, the current status of agricultural production in China has determined the use of grassroots pesticides. At present, the retail organization of agricultural production has a low degree of organizational organization and a variety of planting modes. The phenomenon of “indiscriminate use, multiple use, and failure to use according to time” is widespread. In the use of pesticides, the safety interval is a strictly observing use rule. Although the newly revised Regulations on the Administration of Pesticides has not yet been formally released, the biggest change in the internal regulations is to strengthen the supervision of government responsibilities, clearly ban the regulations, and particularly emphasize the management and management, require the establishment of a business license system, and implement fixed-point operations on pesticides that are restricted in use. , set up the inspection system for stock purchases and the system for importing and selling credits. There are also clear requirements in use, and we strongly support professional use and strengthen the use of pesticides. The author believes that at any time, it is necessary to strengthen the technical guidance and supervision on the use of pesticides. The government supervision department, agricultural technology promotion department and distributors are all obliged to carry out the supervision of pesticides.

Second, the state's supervision of the pesticide department is not enough. While strengthening the investigation and handling of major cases of illegal pesticides, we must also severely crack down on the illegal addition of illegal ingredients such as illegal pesticides and conventional pesticides, and establish a regulatory model in which pesticide registration authorities, companies, and distributors jointly assume responsibility, and implement them in an in-depth manner. The blacklisting system, once it identifies non-compliance objects, is promptly exposed in newspapers, television, and the Internet, expanding the influence of pesticide administrative supervision and enforcement.

Finally, while strengthening the supervision of pesticides, all parties must also increase awareness of safe drug use. Government departments should combine pesticide companies and agricultural technical departments at all levels to strengthen the technical guidance for the safe use of pesticides by farmers, pesticide distributors, and grass-roots agricultural technicians. Emphasize the responsibilities of all parties and disseminate scientific knowledge of pesticide use to farmers in a timely manner. Enterprises must promote and popularize knowledge about safe drug use and form a clear system of rights and responsibilities to ensure that farmers use pesticides safely and avoid excessive occurrence of pesticide residues.